Thus a very scary situation ends with the reassurance of bravery on the part of the state and self destruction on the part of the monstrous offender. As audience we are assumed to identify with the camera crew, which in turn mostly identifies with the officers, i. The incarcerated individuals remain abjected and portrayed as dangerous, unpredictable, a constant and direct threat, and as akin to wild animals.
The horror the audience is supposed to feel at this quite literal exercise of abjection is palpable. A camera man confesses that he was scared when he thought he got hit with urine or feces but then was relieved when it was merely a banana peel that fell on his head.
The implied association of a caged monkey throwing feces and banana peels seems far from coincidental. However, most marginally sympathetic stories are couched in much longer and elaborate constructions of deviance. After most of the filmic segment has established his upbeat spirit and positive attitude, his final statements include his own prediction of his likely failure. Not a happy story after all. Further examples of containment of potentially hopeful or insightful moments include: 1.
We see one inmate who finds great motivation in a Shakespeare class offered in solitary confinement and behaves well enough to be brought into general population where he can see the cast rehearsing. A representative of the Aryan brotherhood is shown to have grown older and wiser and proceeding steadily on a path of rehabilitation, but again, the next frame affirms that he, too, has reoffended within prison and was returned to the worst level within the incarceration system.
The sympathetic portrayal of one inmate, shown quietly reminiscing about the last time he saw a tree, is undercut by the immediately following notice that he was beating up an officer the following day. The interview itself is conducted through the small opening in a holding cell. Jonathan Richardson offers some rather clear and not particularly crazy observations about his own history of self injury connecting it to hopelessness and despair in the face of real life chances of convicted felons, and also a lack of psych medications and explains his hairstyle and makeup as part of his longstanding goth identity see Image Lockup Raw does insert bits of critical commentary from the inmates.
For example, one inmate explains into the camera that caging young offenders in crowded circumstances that rely on and foster violent relationships with others does not make the world safer upon their release.
The scene is immediately followed by a note that this inmate was subsequently locked up for a violent outburst. When other inmates are shown expressing their rage at the prison system or specific acts by officers, they tend to appear less than credible and the assumption of guilt overrides any critical observation the inmate might make.
Those who are the object of episodes with titillating titles, e. The discursive work Lockup does seems to produce a powerful message: in order for us, the audience, to feel safe, the prison system needs to enact these levels of control, including the brutality, violence, and denial of human rights that are shown throughout, but that do not receive direct critical analysis.
In conclusion, while Oz was a fictional series, it may have more to contribute to a critical engagement with the real world than what passes as news-worthy documentary these days. The author gratefully acknowledges support received through a sabbatical leave from the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida. Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete? For Black males in their twenties, 1 in every 8 is in prison or jail on any given day.
These trends have been intensified by the disproportionate impact of the "war on drugs," in which three-fourths of all persons in prison for drug offenses are people of color. On the series' 20th anniversary, check out some facts on the cast, the gore, and the alternate series finale idea that was never filmed.
The tattoo artist kept retracing his needle work so the crew could get the best take. Nabisco factory in Manhattan.
The building had been the first to mass-produce Oreo cookies for the company. Oz is probably best remembered for its sprawling ensemble cast, with actors like Chris Meloni, J. Simmons, and Perrineau all going on to successful careers; others, like Ernie Hudson and Rita Moreno, were already well-established. Not all of them were relegated to the margins: Chuck Zito, who had a recurring role as Italian mafia heavy Chucky Pancamo, was a then-member of the Hells Angels and had served six years in prison for various offenses.
More notably, he received press coverage for allegedly knocking out Jean-Claude Van Damme at a strip club in Here, prisoners are offered an opportunity to reform. Unfortunately, the inmates soon replicate the ethnic gangs of the old prison, with predictably explosive results. It's amazing, in many ways, that Oz has survived as long as it has. It is incredibly violent - to a degree which would never be tolerated in mainstream Hollywood or US network television.
Indeed, the only prison film to come close to the show's atmosphere came out of Australia - John Hillcoat's Ghosts.
The previous three series of Oz have featured poisoning, lynching, burning, shooting, beating, eye-gouging and crucifixion. The actors admit they find it tough going sometimes. At times, even writer Tom Fontana finds it all too much.
He claims that he closed his eyes while penning some scenes because "I didn't want to see myself writing the words I had to produce". Oz is about political cynicism and a morally bankrupt penal system. The giant, harshly lit sets perfectly complement the bleakness of the script. Much of the drama's strength comes from the character-driven plots. And it pulls off the trick of making storylines, which on paper would seem preposterous, become compelling on screen - a tribute to the actors' powers.
Vern Schillinger J. Simmons is a neo-Nazi whose son becomes a drug addict and is imprisoned in the same jail, yet outside his protection.
0コメント